0.00/0.05 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 1440 0.19/0.45 % WCLimit : 180 0.19/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:21:23 UTC 2026 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.24/0.54 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.24/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p 0.54/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 0.54/0.63 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.54/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_ho_12 with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_bool_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 3829075 completed with status 0 0.54/0.63 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2 0.54/0.63 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.54/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.54/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.54/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied 0.54/0.63 % Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN 0.54/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.54/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 91s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 82s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 82s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 82s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % sh5l with pid 3829084 completed with status 0 0.54/0.63 % Result found by sh5l 0.54/0.63 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.54/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.54/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.54/0.63 % No SInE strategy applied 0.54/0.63 % Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN 0.54/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.54/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 91s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 82s (1) cores 0.54/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s 0.54/0.63 % Presaturation interreduction done 0.54/0.63 0.54/0.63 % Proof found! 0.54/0.63 % SZS status Theorem 0.54/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_sort1, type, mu: $tType). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_25, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_26, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_28, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_32, type, mforall_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_34, type, mexists_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_38, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_39, type, mdia: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_41, type, msymmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_50, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_54, type, a1: $i > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_58, type, piotr: mu). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_61, type, beer: mu). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_62, type, likes: mu > mu > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_64, type, possibly_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_68, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.54/0.63 thf(decl_73, type, esk7_1: $i > $i). 0.54/0.63 thf(mdia, axiom, ((mdia)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:(mnot @ (mbox @ X13 @ (mnot @ X6))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mdia)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mnot)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:(((~((X13 @ X3 @ X14)))|((X6 @ X14))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mbox)). 0.54/0.63 thf(msymmetric, axiom, ((msymmetric)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((((X13 @ X15 @ X16))=>((X13 @ X16 @ X15))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', msymmetric)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mvalid)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mimplies, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X6) @ X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mimplies)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X3:$i]:((((X6 @ X3))|((X7 @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mor)). 0.54/0.63 thf(axioms_B_a1, axiom, (msymmetric @ a1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', axioms_B_a1)). 0.54/0.63 thf(axiom_a3_3, axiom, (mvalid @ (mdia @ a1 @ (likes @ piotr @ beer))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', axiom_a3_3)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mforall_ind, axiom, ((mforall_ind)=(^[X8:mu > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X1:mu]:((X8 @ X1 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mforall_ind)). 0.54/0.63 thf(axiom_a2_3, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a1 @ (likes @ piotr @ beer))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', axiom_a2_3)). 0.54/0.63 thf(mexists_ind, axiom, ((mexists_ind)=(^[X11:mu > $i > $o]:(mnot @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(mnot @ (X11 @ X1))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', mexists_ind)). 0.54/0.63 thf(axiom_user_communication_3, axiom, (mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(mforall_ind @ (^[X2:mu]:(mimplies @ (mdia @ a1 @ (likes @ X1 @ X2)) @ (possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', axiom_user_communication_3)). 0.54/0.63 thf(conj, conjecture, (mvalid @ (mexists_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(mexists_ind @ (^[X2:mu]:(possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5j97heVNeI/E---3.1_3829062.p', conj)). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((mdia)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~((![X24:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X24)))|((~((Z1 @ X24))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mdia])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X14:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X14)))|((Z1 @ X14))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((msymmetric)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((((Z0 @ X15 @ X16))=>((Z0 @ X16 @ X15))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[msymmetric])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((mdia)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~((![X24:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X24)))|((~((Z1 @ X24))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((~((Z0 @ Z2))))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((Z0 @ Z2))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X121:$i, X122:$i]:(((a1 @ X121 @ X122)=>(a1 @ X122 @ X121))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_B_a1, c_0_17])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X107:$i]:(~(![X106:$i]:((~(a1 @ X107 @ X106)|~(likes @ piotr @ beer @ X106))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_a3_3, c_0_18]), c_0_19])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((~((Z0 @ Z2))))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_15]), c_0_21])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_25, plain, ((mforall_ind)=(^[Z0:mu > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X1:mu]:((Z0 @ X1 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mforall_ind])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X96:$i, X95:$i]:((~(a1 @ X96 @ X95)|(likes @ piotr @ beer @ X95))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_a2_3, c_0_16]), c_0_19])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X234:$i, X235:$i]:((~(a1 @ X234 @ X235)|(a1 @ X235 @ X234))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X219:$i]:(((a1 @ X219 @ (esk7_1 @ X219))&(likes @ piotr @ beer @ (esk7_1 @ X219)))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_29, plain, ((mexists_ind)=(^[Z0:mu > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((![X22:mu]:((~((Z0 @ X22 @ Z1))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mexists_ind])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X69:$i, X68:mu, X67:mu]:((~(~(![X66:$i]:((~(a1 @ X69 @ X66)|~(likes @ X68 @ X67 @ X66)))))|(possibly_likes @ X68 @ X67 @ X69))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_user_communication_3]), c_0_24]), c_0_25]), c_0_18]), c_0_19])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X208:$i, X209:$i]:((~(a1 @ X208 @ X209)|(likes @ piotr @ beer @ X209))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((a1 @ X14 @ X3)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a1 @ X3 @ (esk7_1 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ~((mvalid @ (mexists_ind @ (^[X1:mu]:(mexists_ind @ (^[X2:mu]:(possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_35, plain, ((mexists_ind)=(^[Z0:mu > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((![X22:mu]:((~((Z0 @ X22 @ Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_15]), c_0_25])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X179:$i, X180:mu, X181:mu, X182:$i]:((~(a1 @ X179 @ X182)|~(likes @ X180 @ X181 @ X182)|(possibly_likes @ X180 @ X181 @ X179))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((likes @ piotr @ beer @ X14)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a1 @ (esk7_1 @ X3) @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ~(![X57:$i]:(~(![X56:mu]:(~(~(![X55:mu]:(~(possibly_likes @ X56 @ X55 @ X57)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]), c_0_35]), c_0_19])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_40, plain, ![X3:$i, X2:mu, X1:mu, X14:$i]:(((possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14))|~((likes @ X1 @ X2 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X3:$i]:((likes @ piotr @ beer @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ![X169:mu, X170:mu]:(~(possibly_likes @ X169 @ X170 @ esk2_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])])])])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_43, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((possibly_likes @ piotr @ beer @ X3)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X1:mu, X2:mu]:(~((possibly_likes @ X1 @ X2 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X3:$i]:((possibly_likes @ piotr @ beer @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_33])). 0.54/0.63 thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45]), ['proof']). 0.54/0.63 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.54/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 118 0.54/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.54/0.63 % Initial clauses : 91 0.54/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 45 0.54/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 46 0.54/0.63 % Processed clauses : 102 0.54/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.54/0.63 % ...subsumed : 5 0.54/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 97 0.54/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.54/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.54/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.54/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 11 0.54/0.63 % Generated clauses : 116 0.54/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 107 0.54/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.54/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.54/0.63 % Paramodulations : 116 0.54/0.63 % Factorizations : 0 0.54/0.63 % NegExts : 0 0.54/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.54/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.54/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 19 0.54/0.63 % ...of those cached : 4 0.54/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.54/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0 0.54/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.54/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.54/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.54/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.54/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.54/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.54/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.54/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.54/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.54/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.54/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 42 0.54/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 16 0.54/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.54/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.54/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 25 0.54/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78 0.54/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 191 0.54/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.54/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 55 0.54/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 202 0.54/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 126 0.54/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5 0.54/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.54/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.54/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 10 0.54/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 9 0.54/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 102 0.54/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0 0.54/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11557 0.54/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3237 0.54/0.63 0.54/0.63 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.54/0.63 % User time : 0.027 s 0.54/0.63 % System time : 0.007 s 0.54/0.63 % Total time : 0.034 s 0.54/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4248 pages 0.54/0.63 0.54/0.63 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.54/0.63 % User time : 0.075 s 0.54/0.63 % System time : 0.028 s 0.54/0.63 % Total time : 0.103 s 0.54/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages 0.54/0.63 % E exiting 0.54/0.64 EOF